Post

A phone call home, once a year

A short essay on the second Sunday in May, and on the strange formality of a weekly call home that the calendar suddenly insists everyone else is also making. On what we say on these calls, and what we leave out.

The second Sunday in May arrives each year with an advertising budget behind it, and by the time it comes round the whole city is pretending, in a light-hearted way, to think about it at once. Flower shops run out of the expensive stems. The messaging apps fill with the same stock images of hands holding hands. Restaurants quietly double their Sunday-night prices. And then, on the evening itself, a great many people sit down and make the phone call that they would have made anyway, on an ordinary Wednesday, if they had been in the habit.

The calls themselves are stranger than the occasion suggests. The conversation is not, usually, about anything. One asks about the weather at home, about the health of relatives whose names are asked with care, about whether the plants have been watered, about what was eaten for the week. None of this is important. The content is almost deliberately thin, as if the point were not the information exchanged but the fact of the exchange itself, the small recurring proof that the line still works between two places that are not in the same room.

What is interesting is how the script changes on the designated Sunday. On a random midweek call, the exchange runs to ten minutes and ends because someone has a meeting. On the second Sunday, nobody has anywhere to be, and so the silences stretch, and in the silences the conversation edges, briefly, toward things it normally avoids. One might mention, almost in passing, that work has been a little much lately, without quite saying that it has been a lot. The other might admit, equally lightly, that a routine check-up went fine, and only later, on a second replaying of the call, does the speaker wonder whether that was the whole story.

There is a tenderness that is hard to locate in the ordinary version of these relationships, and the calendar knows it. The designated holiday does not create the feeling; it simply gives everyone permission to act on it for one evening, without having to explain. The alternative, the year-round expectation of regular, open, emotionally honest contact, is a skill most families never quite master. So they outsource it to a Sunday, and to a florist, and call it enough.

This is not a complaint about the arrangement, which works. A relationship conducted through short weekly calls and one amplified Sunday a year is not a failure of depth so much as a style of it, diffuse and dependable rather than deep. Two people need not talk about everything to be holding the line. They need only to keep showing up on the line, which is, most weeks, exactly what happens.

By Monday the flowers are on the table at home and the prices have gone back to normal. The call will not be repeated at that length for another twelve months. But the next midweek call comes, as it always does, short and practical and unremarkable, and in the background of it, unsaid, is the whole reason anyone bothers to pick up the phone at all.

This post is licensed under CC BY 4.0 by the author.