A new year on an old schedule: the first morning of 2025
The first morning of 2025 arrived without drama, which is exactly what a new year should do, and the quiet of 1 January gave the year ahead room to be seen clearly for once. The schedule of the coming year was already written before it began: inaugurations, budgets, tournaments and a handful of dates that everyone will remember regardless of what happens on the days between.
The first morning of 2025 arrived without drama, which is exactly what a new year should do. The fireworks had been and gone, the resolutions had been made and half-forgotten, and the world woke to a January that looked, on the surface, like every January: grey in the north, warm in the south, and full of people returning to work with the particular reluctance that the first Monday of the year reserves. The quiet of 1 January gave the year ahead room to be seen clearly for once, and the year ahead, on inspection, was already crowded.
The schedule of the coming year was written before it began. The inauguration in Washington would come in under three weeks, with all the ceremony and all the uncertainty that a transfer of power carries even when the outcome is known. The courts had their calendars, the central banks their meetings, the football tournaments their brackets, and the calendar industry, which prints the dates that everyone else plans around, had done its work months ago. What the new year offers is not a blank page but a printed page, and the only freedom is in the margins, the days that the planners left empty and that the events will fill without asking permission.
The personal scale of the year deserves as much attention as the institutional one. The resolutions that were made on 31 December, the gym memberships, the savings targets, the promises to call home more often, are the same ones that were made last year and the year before, and the sameness is not a failure; it is the shape of ordinary life, which is mostly the repetition of intentions with occasional lapses and occasional successes. The new year’s gift is not that the intentions will be kept, because they mostly will not be, but that they will be made again, and that the making of them, the small ceremony of deciding to try, is a habit worth keeping for its own sake.
The year ahead carried, in its first hours, the usual mixture of the predictable and the genuinely uncertain, and the mixture was the honest measure of what a new year is. The dates on the calendar would hold; the events between them would not follow the script. Some of the days would be remembered for decades, and the people living through them would not know, while they were happening, which days those were, because that knowledge arrives only in the looking back. The first morning of 2025 was a day like any other, and it was also the day on which the year began, and the two facts are not in contradiction.
The new year deserves the attention it gets, and the attention should be lighter than the culture makes it. A year is a long time, and most of it will be ordinary, and the ordinariness is the point rather than the problem. The schedule was printed before the year began; the life between the printed dates was not, and that is where the year will actually be spent. The first morning of 2025 had no news to make, and the absence of news was the news worth having: the world was still here, the work was still waiting, and the year was, for a few quiet hours, exactly what it promised to be.